Today’s Must-Read: The Economics of Declining Unionization

Rommesh Ponnuru has the must-read today … if it weren’t for that pesky copyright, we’d produce the entire piece for you, but out of all the good stuff here’s one part worth remembering. Describing the NLRB attack on employers as it attempts to stave off declining unionization, Ponnuru writes:

The shift toward a more competitive economy has not hurt workers in general: Total employee compensation as a share of the economy held fairly steady during the second half of the last century even as unions were shrinking. (It’s true that wages as a share of the economy fell, but that was a result of the increased cost of benefits.) The shift has, however, increased inequality among workers, with more rewards going to those with higher skills.

If we want to reverse the unions’ decline, the kind of labor-law changes that the Obama administration’s appointees to the NLRB have in mind — such as speeding up elections — are unlikely to do the trick. We would have to reduce competition among companies, too, domestically and internationally. The economy would have to be far more regulated than anyone in the mainstream of American politics has advocated. And we would almost certainly have to be willing to be a poorer country. We shouldn’t want any of that.

Our country has plenty of economic problems. But we also have blessings, and the continued decline of labor unions is one of them.

This entry was posted in Jobs in America

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>